On October 5, 2012, four young men left the University of Port Harcourt to collect a debt in a small village, Aluu. Lloyd Toku Mike, Ugonna Obuzor, Tekena Elkanah and Chiadika Biringa were friends, roommates, and, coincidentally, all first sons of their families. Within minutes of arriving in Aluu, holding weapons only enough to scare their debtor, word spread quickly that they were armed robbers. A mob formed, the four friends were stripped naked, beaten,and stoned until they were nearly unconscious, then they were dragged through mud with concrete slabs dropped on their heads. Car tyres doused in petrol were forced around their necks, a method of killing known as necklacing, and they were set ablaze amidst pleas for their lives. Police officers were reportedly present and did nothing to stop it. The killings were filmed on phones and circulated online, turning private grief into a national reckoning that the country has never fully absorbed.
Aluu was not the beginning of jungle justice in Nigeria, and it would not be the end. In the early 2000s, when democratic government had just returned but the machinery of justice was weaker, several southeastern state governments enlisted a vigilante group, Bakassi Boys and gave them free rein to hunt down and publicly execute criminal suspects, often by burning. The practice normalised the image of a body ringed by a jeering crowd as an acceptable form of justice. In 2005, the lynching of an eleven year old boy in Lagos shocked the country.
Years later, panic over a spate of ritual killings blamed on a cult called Badoo in the Ikorodu area of Lagos led to the death of a man nicknamed MC Think Twice, who was mistaken for a cult member and killed on the spot. A 2014 survey found that 43% of Nigerians said they had personally witnessed an act of mob violence. By the time the Aluu killings reached the courts in 2017, five years had passed, and a police sergeant among the accused was one of only three people eventually convicted, while four other suspects were acquitted for lack of proof. That gap between an unmistakably public crime and a slow, thin trickle of accountability has defined almost every case since.
On May 12, 2022, Deborah Samuel, also known as Deborah Yakubu, a second-year student at the Shehu Shagari College of Education in Sokoto, sent a voice note to a WhatsApp group asking that religious content be kept off a page meant for school updates, and some classmates deemed the remark blasphemous against the Prophet Muhammad. When a crowd gathered, school authorities moved her into a security room and a car was waiting to take her to the police station, but a mob of fellow students overran the campus, dragged her out, stoned her, threw tyres around her and set her ablaze while security personnel fired tear gas and warning shots that failed to disperse the crowd.
Witnesses said her final words were a question directed at the mob, asking what they hoped to achieve. Two suspects were eventually charged, not with murder but with criminal conspiracy and inciting public disturbance, offences carrying a maximum sentence of two years. A team of 34 lawyers defended them, and the court later acquitted both after prosecutors failed to appear. Deborah’s case is frequently cited alongside the case of Bridget Agbahime, a trader beaten to death at a market in Kano in 2016 after an argument escalated into a blasphemy accusation. Together they illustrate how blasphemy allegations are weaponized in northern Nigeria.
On 21 June, 2026, in Mararaban Jos, a community along the Kaduna-Zaria highway, Ummulkhair Usman, a mother of four and an Islamic school teacher, got lost on her way to a Qur’anic lecture and stopped to ask children for directions. Some women nearby accused her of trying to kidnap the children, a mob formed so quickly that police immediately moved her into protective custody at a nearby station before relatives, community elders, and Islamic scholars arrived to vouch for her, insisting there was no evidence behind the accusation. It made no difference, however.
Hundreds of people gathered at the station, overwhelming the officers on duty, and according to Amnesty International, witnesses told its investigators that police officers brought Ummulkhair out and handed her directly to the mob that killed her and burned her body. The Inspector General of Police ordered an investigation into that specific allegation, that the officers assigned to protect her instead delivered her to the people who eventually killed her. Twenty four suspects have been arraigned on charges including culpable homicide. It is a near exact echo of what happened to Deborah Samuel, a victim placed in state custody, an angry mob, and security forces that either could not or did not hold the line.
The case of Maryam Usman shows how far the impulse toward violence has migrated into everyday life. Maryam was a thirty-year-old teacher at Brains Minds Nursery and Primary School in Ugbamaka, Kogi State. On June 18, 2026, she reportedly hit a pupil for misconduct. That afternoon, the child’s father, identified by police as Abdullahi Ishaka, stormed the school with two women and beat her so severely that she never recovered, she died in the hospital a week later on June 25.
Last year, in Uromi, Edo State, a truck carrying twenty-seven hunters, travelling from Port Harcourt to Kano for Eid celebrations, was stopped by local vigilantes who searched the vehicle and found dane guns traditionally used by hunters. Word spread that armed Fulani kidnappers had been caught. A mob gathered, tied the victims to tyres, doused them in petrol and burned them alive; witnesses described a harrowing scene where a wheelbarrow was used to shovel one man, still screaming for help, into the raging fire while onlookers laughed. Sixteen men were killed, they were neither Fulani nor kidnappers. They were just Hausa hunters carrying licensed weapons and unfortunate enough to be travelling home at the time they did. The Edo State Police Command later confirmed that they were not terrorists, and arrested more than a dozen suspects.
The Uromi lynching offers the clearest window into what can be called lateral violence, in which people who share a common condition of vulnerability, insecurity, or oppression turn their rage on each other rather than on the actual source of their suffering. In February 2018, seven Fulani men with no connection to any crime were seized from a public transport vehicle in Gboko, Benue State, and lynched in the wake of separate herder attacks elsewhere; months later, Berom youths in Plateau State blocked highways after attacks on their villages and killed an unknown number of Fulani or people merely believed to be Fulani. Most recently, in June 2026, a young man named Abdullahi Bello was killed by a mob in the Rantiya community of Jos South, Plateau State, after being mistaken for a Fulani herdsman. His sister told reporters that police asked if the deceased was Fulani, he was not, he was only her blood brother.
Behind every one of these killings sits the same structural failure, an absence of a moral compass, and no faith that formal justice will ever arrive. Research by SBM Intelligence found that at least 391 people were killed by mobs across Nigeria between 2019 and May 2022 alone, in 279 recorded incidents, and that the pattern of what triggers a killing differs sharply by region. The south, the research found, was deadlier in raw numbers, with 223 deaths recorded there against 168 in the north over that period, and southern incidents were also more frequent. But the character of the trigger diverges even more than the body count. In the north, and especially where Sharia operates alongside secular law, the most volatile and reliably fatal accusation is blasphemy. In the south, the trigger is far more often theft, kidnapping, or simple unverified suspicion.
The police and the judiciary do not merely fail to prevent these killings; in several of the most documented recent cases, they have been directly implicated in delivering victims to their killers. In Aluu, officers were present at the scene and did not intervene. In Sokoto, security personnel fired tear gas but were overrun. In Mararaban Jos, Amnesty International’s investigation alleges that officers physically handed Ummulkhair Usman to the mob that burned her. When the institution whose entire justification is the monopoly on legitimate force instead becomes a conduit to the crowd, it does not just fail to prevent violence, it launders it, giving a lynching the texture of a sanctioned outcome.
Not only do the police officers deliver the victims to their killers, but sometimes they are the killers themselves. In late April, a police officer, ASP Nuhu Usman, fatally shot a restrained suspect, 28-year old Mene Ogidi, in Delta state. Ogidi had reportedly been apprehended for trying to waybill a parcel containing a pistol and ammunition. In the viral video of his murder, he can be heard begging officers not to shoot, offering to lead them to a friend he claimed deceived him.
Police spokesperson Bright Edafe confirmed the shooting violated Force Order 237 and standard procedure. Usman has since been arrested and sent to the Force Disciplinary Committee in Abuja for sanction and prosecution.
The judiciary compounds the damage on the back end. The Aluu trial took five years to produce a partial conviction. The men charged for Deborah Samuel’s death were never charged with her killing at all, only with inciting disturbance, and were acquitted when prosecutors failed to show up in court. When citizens watch a case with the kind of overwhelming public evidence that a lynching produces, often captured on video by the killers themselves, dissolve into a token charge or a stalled trial, the lesson they draw is that reporting crimes to the police or waiting for the courts is a slower and less certain path to justice than picking up a tyres and cans of petrol.
None of this excuses what happens in the crowd, and it is worth being honest about what mob violence actually is at the level of the individual participant, because the language of “the mob” as an abstract force can obscure the moral choice each person in it makes. Social psychologists describe a set of conditions that make ordinary people capable of extraordinary cruelty in a group that they would never contemplate alone: deindividuation, in which the anonymity of a crowd erodes a person’s sense of individual accountability; diffusion of responsibility, in which each participant reasons that guilt for the outcome is shared among hundreds rather than owned by any one hand; and a kind of moral disengagement in which the victim is first reclassified, as a thief, a kidnapper, a blasphemer, an ethnic threat, before the violence begins, so that the killing feels less like murder and more like enforcement.
None of the men who killed the Aluu Four, or dragged Deborah Samuel from a security room to her death, burned the hunters passing through Uromi, or handed Ummulkhair Usman to an angry mob would likely describe themselves as murderers. They would describe themselves as instruments of justice. That self-deception, multiplied across hundreds of participants and normalised by years of impunity, is the moral failure at the centre of this phenomenon: a society that has quietly agreed to believe that ordinary people, in a state of rage and with no evidence beyond rumour, are more reliable arbiters of guilt and punishment than the police and courts they no longer trust.
That belief is not irrational so much as it is a rational response to a state that has spent decades teaching its citizens not to expect anything better. Every unresolved trial, every officer who stands by while a crowd forms, every acquittal secured by a battalion of defence lawyers against a case built on eyewitness video, adds one more data point to the argument that the mob is faster and surer than the law. Reversing that will require more than public education campaigns urging restraint, though those matter. It will require police accountability mechanisms with teeth for officers who fail or refuse to protect people in custody, judicial processes fast and transparent enough to answer a killing within months rather than years, and consequences for participants in a lynching serious enough to make the crowd itself, not just its instigators, understand that anonymity inside a mob is not actually a shield.
0 Comments
Add your own hot takes